What is the Statute of Limitations for Federal Crimes?
If you were arrested for a crime, you were most likely detained by a police officer and charged under California law. However, if you were arrested by a federal law enforcement agency (like the F.B.I.) or committed a crime that violates federal statute, you could be charged under federal law.
It is possible to be charged for the same crime under state law and federal law. If the charges against you are dismissed at state level, you could still be facing federal charges, and vice versa. The penalties upon conviction for a federal crime are often much harsher than the penalties upon a conviction at state level.
Like state crimes, federal crimes have a statute of limitations. A statute of limitations is a time limit where charges must be filed against a person suspected of a crime within a certain amount of time from the date the alleged crime occurred. This can protect people from being harassed and having to constantly defend themselves from old charges. Evidence may have also deteriorated or may no longer be available as time goes on.
What is the Statute of Limitations for Federal Crimes?
Under United States Code 18 Section 3282, the statute of limitations for most federal crimes is five years. However, the statute of limitations may be longer or may not exist for certain crimes. The statute of limitations can also be extended in certain circumstances, including cases where the accused is a fugitive, DNA evidence is required of the accused, or time is needed to secure foreign evidence overseas.
In Which Cases is the Statute of Limitations Longer than Others?
The federal statute of limitations can be longer than five years for certain crimes, including:
- Federal tax evasion (U.S. Code 26 Section 7201) – 6 years
- Failure to file a tax return with the I.R.S. (U.S. Code 26 Section 7203) – 6 years
- Major fraud involving at least $1 million against the federal government (U.S. Code 18 Section 1031) – 7 years
- Non-violent violations of federal terrorism laws (U.S. Code 18 Section 3286(a)) – 8 years
- Arson (U.S. Code 18 Section 3295) – 10 years
- Embezzling funds from a federal financial institution (U.S. Code 18 Section 657) – 10 years
- Using false or fraudulent citizenship papers (U.S. Code 18 Section 1423) – 10 years
- Theft of major artwork (U.S. Code 18 Section 3294) – 20 years
Which Cases Do Not Have a Statute of Limitations?
There is no federal statute of limitations for certain crimes. A person can be charged at any time for the following:
- Federal crimes punishable by death (U.S. Code 18 Section 3281)
- Terrorism crimes that resulted in death or serious bodily injury (U.S. Code 18 Section 3286)
- Sex crimes with a minor (U.S. Code 18 Section 3283)
Call Wallin & Klarich Today
If you or a loved one is facing a criminal charge at the federal level, it is critical that you speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney. At Wallin & Klarich, our attorneys have over 40 years of experience in handling federal offenses in Southern California. Our attorneys will fight to get you the best possible outcome in your case.
With offices in Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks, Torrance, Tustin, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, West Covina and Victorville, there is an experienced Wallin & Klarich Southern California criminal defense attorney near you no matter where you work or live.
Call us today at (877) 4-NO-JAIL or (877) 466-5245 for a free phone consultation. We will get through this together.
I’m under constant harassment from local police agencies and local leader’s because I robbed according to the FBI numerous banks in and around the greater Los Angeles area over 20 years ago.
I was assaulted and followed and ran out of town after several death threats towards me.
This seems very illegal if you did not rob the banks. Did you face charges?
Scenario: An age discrimination suit is filed within the allotted time period. Is there a statute of limitations, or guideline of such, that is used on determining whether or not evidence is usable. For example, most recent discrimination was February 7th. EEOC complaint filed within the allotted 300 days for our state. Is plaintiff allowed to use evidence that is more than 300 days older than the complaint? Events or evidence more than 300 days prior to the date of the complaint?
The evidence cannot be used to establish an offense that is completely beyond the statute of limitations. However, if at least one element of the offense is within the statute of limitations, then the other elements are admissible–generally speaking. However, when it comes to age discrimination, all the necessary elements happen simultaneously. So long as the discriminatory event happened within the statute of limitations evidence tending to prove the liability or lack thereof is admissible, so long as not made inadmissible by some other rule.
For example, lets say an employer fires someone. The next day the employer decides he is glad he got rid of the employee because he was too old for the job. There is no unlawful discrimination here because the intent to discriminate based on age did not happen simultaneously with the event….but good luck to the attorney who tries to convince a jury of this.