Restraining orders are court-issued mandates 09designed to protect people from physical abuse, harassment and/or stalking. If a restraining order is issued against you, it likely requires you to stay away from and not make contact with the protected person. Violating a restraining order could lead to serious criminal penalties, including jail time and expensive fines.

Having a “no contact” restraining order issued against you means that you cannot make any contact with the protected person, including in person contact, phone calls, emails and text messages. Does having a restraining order against you also mean that you cannot message or mention the person on your social media accounts?

Does a Restraining Order Include Facebook Contact?

The rise of social media as a means of interaction has changed what the courts consider to be “contact.” Courts across the U.S. have determined that interactions on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram and other social media networks can violate the terms of a restraining order.

These court decisions mean that sending private messages to a “protected” person can be a violation of a restraining order, as well as “tagging” the protected individual in your post.

Court Cases Involving Social Media Restraining Order Violations

In a 2009 case, a court ruled that “poking” someone on Facebook is a form of communication that is protected by a restraining order. In the case, a woman who had a restraining order issued against her used Facebook to send a digital “poke” to the protected person. The “poke” was considered to be a method of communication because it required the deliberate action of selecting a person and reaching out to him or her.

A separate case in 2016 led a court to rule that tagging someone on Facebook – specifically, the notification that is sent to a person who is tagged – is a restraining order violation. The case involved a woman who was ordered not to make contact with her sister-in-law. The woman proceeded to tag her sister-in-law in a post in which she called her “stupid” and made other negative comments. The court ruled that the phrase “”by electronic or any other means” in a protective order includes social media networks such as Facebook.

Court rulings are beginning to catch up with modern technology, so you should also avoid posting on the protected person’s page and mentioning the protected person at all in your own social media posts if you have a restraining order against you.

Accused of Violating a Restraining Order? Contact Wallin & Klarich Today

If you or a loved have been accused of violating a restraining order, it is important that you speak with an experienced restraining order attorney immediately. At Wallin & Klarich, our skilled criminal defense lawyers have been successfully defending clients accused of violating restraining orders for more than 35 years. Let us help you now.

With offices in Orange County, Riverside, San Bernardino, Victorville, West Covina, Torrance, Los Angeles and San Diego, you can find an experienced Wallin & Klarich restraining order attorney available near you no matter where you are located.

Call our office today at (877) 4-NO-JAIL or (877) 466-5245 for a free phone consultation. We will get through this together.

Author

Author: Paul Wallin

Paul Wallin is one of the most highly respected attorneys in Southern California. His vast experience, zealous advocacy for his clients and extensive knowledge of many areas of the law make Mr. Wallin a premiere Southern California attorney. Mr. Wallin founded Wallin & Klarich in 1981. As the senior partner of Wallin & Klarich, Mr. Wallin has been successfully representing clients for more than 30 years. Clients come to him for help in matters involving assault and battery, drug crimes, juvenile crimes, theft, manslaughter, sex offenses, murder, violent crimes, misdemeanors and felonies. Mr. Wallin also helps clients with family law matters such as divorce and child custody.

Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, now is the time to contact us.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.