35+ Years Criminal Defense Experience in California

awards

Resisting an Executive Officer in Performance of Duty – California Penal Code 69 PC

resisting an executive officer
Under California Penal Code Section 69, it is a crime to resist an executive officer in performance of his or her duty. Although it is similar to the crime of resisting arrest (California Penal Code Section 148(a)), resisting an executive officer is a much more serious crime in California.

Under California Penal Code 69, resisting an executive officer is defined as:

  1. A willful and unlawful attempt, by means of any threat or violence, to deter or prevent an executive officer from performing his or her lawful duty; or
  2. The use of force or violence to resist an executive officer in the performance of his or her lawful duty.

Key Definitions

Executive Officer: An executive officer is any public employee who is authorized to use his or her own discretion to carry out his or her lawful duties. The range of persons included in this definition is much broader than just law enforcement personnel such as police officers or sheriff’s deputies. Judges, district attorneys, public defenders, and elected officials are also considered executive officers.

Lawful Duties: The executive officer’s lawful duties are those duties that he or she is tasked with performing as a requirement of his or her profession. For example, a district attorney has the discretion whether or not to press charges in a criminal case. Threatening to use violence in order to deter the district attorney from pressing charges in a criminal case would therefore be a crime under this section.

Prosecution for PC 69 Charges

Prosecution of resisting an executive officer charges - California Penal Code 69 PC

As noted above, a violation of California Penal Code 69 can occur in two forms: preventing or deterring an executive officer from performing his or her duties, or resisting the officer while he or she is performing those duties.

Each of the two parts of this crime has a separate set of elements that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt to convict you of this crime. In order to convict you of attempting to deter an executive officer, the prosecution must prove that:

  1. You willfully and unlawfully used violence and/or threat of violence to try to prevent or deter an executive officer from performing his or her lawful duty; and
  2. When you acted, you intended to prevent or deter the executive officer from performing his or her lawful duty.1

In order to convict you of resisting an executive officer through the use of force or violence while the officer is engaged in his or her duties, the prosecution must prove that:

  1. You unlawfully used force or violence to resist an executive officer;
  2. When you acted, the executive officer was performing his or her lawful duty; and
  3. When you acted, you knew the executive officer was performing his or her duty.2

Punishment for Resisting an Executive Officer

If you are convicted of this crime, you face serious consequences. Resisting an executive officer is a crime a crime that can be charged as a misdemeanor or felony in California. If you are convicted of a felony, you face:

  • 16 months, or two or three years in county jail;
  • A maximum fine of $10,000; or
  • Both jail and fine.

If you are convicted of a misdemeanor, you face:

  • Up to 364 days in county jail;
  • A maximum fine of $10,000; or
  • Both jail and fine.

Defenses to a Charge of Resisting an Executive Officer

Defenses to resisting an executive officer charges - California Penal Code 69 PC

If you are being charged with resisting an executive officer under California Penal Code Section 69, a skilled criminal defense attorney may be able to employ several defenses on your behalf. Some of these defenses include:

  1. No intent. In order to convict you of this crime, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you had intent to resist or prevent the executive officer from performing his or her duties. Thus, your lawyer can use this as a valid defense to argue that there is no evidence that shows you had intent to do so when you acted in such a manner.
  1. Unlawful duties. In order for you to be convicted of resisting an executive officer, the prosecution must prove that you prevented the executive officer from performing his or her lawful duties. Thus, your attorney can argue that the officer was attempting to perform his or her duties in an unlawful In other words, executive officers are not protected when performing illegal or unlawful conduct.3
  1. False accusations. If you feel you have been charged with resisting an executive officer based upon false accusations, a skilled attorney may be able to find evidence to disprove these claims and present this evidence in court.

Frequently Asked Questions

At Wallin & Klarich, we often receive questions from clients regarding their cases. Here are some common questions we receive from those facing charges of resisting an executive officer:

(1) How is resisting an executive officer different from resisting arrest?

The crime of resisting an executive officer includes situations that are not related to your arrest, such as interfering with a judge in performance of his or her duties in a case, or attempting to convince a prosecutor to dismiss a case.

(2) Can I be convicted for making a threat that I could not have carried out?

Yes. Unlike assault cases where the defendant must have the apparent immediate ability to act on any verbal threat, threats made against an executive officer do not have to be immediate, and the defendant need not show any ability to carry out the threat.

(3) The executive officer came into my home without a warrant. Can I be convicted of resisting an executive officer?

Possibly. It is important to hire a skilled attorney when an executive officer entered your home. An executive officer may enter your home lawfully despite not having a search warrant. In such situations, you could be convicted for resisting an executive officer.

Contact the Criminal Defense Attorneys at Wallin & Klarich Today

Wallin & Klarich PC 69 defense attorneys

If you are facing charges for resisting an executive officer, you will need a skilled and experienced criminal defense attorney to fight on your behalf. At Wallin & Klarich, our team of attorneys and legal professionals has been successfully defending clients against criminal charges for over 30 years. We work tirelessly and with dedication to help our clients obtain the best possible outcome in every case. We can help you, too.

With offices in Orange County, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Bernardino, Riverside, and Ventura, there is an experienced Wallin & Klarich criminal defense attorney available to help you no matter where you work or live.

Contact our offices today at (877) 4-NO-JAIL or (877) 466-5245 for a free, no-obligation phone consultation. We will get through this together.

 


 

1. CALCRIM No. 2651. Trying to Prevent an Executive Officer From Performing Duty (Pen. Code § 69).

2. CALCRIM No. 2652. Resisting an Executive Officer in Performance of Duty (Pen. Code § 69).

3. People v. Gonzalez (1990) 51 Cal.3d 1179, 1217, 275 Cal.Rptr. 729, 800 P.2d 1159

Was This Article Helpful? Please Share it.

Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, now is the time to contact us.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Related Testimonials

    "

    I would like to sincerely thank you for helping me with obtaining my Certificate of Rehabilitation. I now realize the importance of obtaining a law firm that has years of experience in criminal law. The way the package was organized and presented to the presiding judge was very impressive to me. The person that tried … Continue reading “Certificate of Rehabilitation and Governor’s Pardon Testimonials”

    View All
    "

    My brother was convicted of second degree murder in Los Angeles County. He was sentenced to 16 years to life in state prison. I hired Stephen Klarich from the law firm of Wallin and Klarich to work on his appeal. Our family was very worried and fearful he would spend the rest of his life … Continue reading “PC 1237 | Appeals Testimonials”

    View All
    "

    ARSON: “My husband and I received a shock recently when our son was arrested for starting a fire at a state park. But our shock turned into horror when he was charged with felony arson. We immediately hired the Law Firm of Wallin & Klarich. After a review of the evidence, Wallin & Klarich had … Continue reading “Client Testimonials: Arson”

    View All
attorneys

Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, this is the time to contact us.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
awards
Get In Touch
Contact Info
wklaw
17592 Irvine Blvd. Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 730-5300
(877) 466-5245
Counties

Los Angeles County

Los Angeles | Long Beach | Glendale | Santa Clarita | Lancaster | Palmdale | Pomona | Torrance | Pasadena | West Covina | Carson | Santa Monica | Whittier | Lakewood | Redondo Beach | Arcadia | Diamond Bar | Glendora | Cerritos | La Mirada | Rancho Palos Verdes | Culver City | Manhattan Beach | Claremont | Beverly Hills | San Dimas | Walnut | Calabasas | Hermosa Beach | El Segundo | Palos Verdes Estates | Malibu

Orange County

Santa Ana | Anaheim | Irvine | Huntington Beach | Garden Grove | Orange | Fullerton | Costa Mesa | Mission Viejo | Westminster | Newport Beach | Buena Park | Lake Forest | Tustin | Yorba Linda | San Clemente | Laguna Niguel | La Habra | Fountain Valley | Anaheim Hills | Placentia | Rancho Santa Margarita | Aliso Viejo | Cypress | Brea | Stanton | San Juan Capistrano | Dana Point | Laguna Hills | North Tustin | Seal Beach | Ladera Ranch | Laguna Beach | Laguna Woods | La Palma | Coto de Caza | Los Alamitos | Rossmoor | Midway City | Las Flores | Villa Park

Riverside County

Riverside | Moreno Valley | Corona | Temecula | Murrieta | Jurupa Valley | Indio | Hemet | Menifee | Perris | Eastvale | Cathedral City | Palm Desert | Lake Elsinore | Palm Springs | La Quinta | Coachella | San Jacinto | Beaumont | Wildomar | Banning | Norco | Desert Hot Springs | Blythe | Rancho Mirage | Canyon Lake | Calimesa | Indian Wells

San Bernardino County

San Bernardino | Fontana | Rancho Cucamonga | Ontario | Victorville | Rialto | Hesperia | Chino | Chino Hills | Upland | Apple Valley | Redlands | Highland | Colton | Yucaipa | Montclair | Adelanto | Twentynine Palms | Loma Linda | Barstow | Yucca Valley | Grand Terrace | Big Bear Lake | Needles

San Diego

San Diego | Oceanside | Escondido | Carlsbad | Vista | San Marcos | Encinitas | Solana Beach | El Cajon | Santee | Poway | La Mesa | Del Mar

Ventura

Oxnard | Thousand Oaks | Simi Valley | Ventura | Camarillo | Moorpark | Santa Paula | Port Hueneme | Fillmore | Ojai

Copyright © 2018 Wallin & Klarich - All rights reserved
California Criminal Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor should it be considered the formation of a lawyer or attorney-client relationship. Any case results presented on the site are based upon the facts of a particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. The contents of this website may contain legal advertising. If you would like to find out more information about your particular legal matter, contact our office for a free telephonic consultation. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California.
X