35+ Years Criminal Defense Experience in California

awards

Federal Mail and Wire Fraud – 18 USC 1341 & 1343

internet crimes - federal wire fraud
Have you been federally charged with wire fraud for an internet or email scheme?

Mail and wire fraud are some of the most common schemes committed in the U.S. You can be charged with mail fraud if you use the United States Postal Service or any mail drop or private postal services (such as UPS or FedEx) to send any materials that are related to a scheme to commit fraud.

Similarly, you can be charged with the federal crime of wire fraud if you used a telephone, interstate wires, or the internet as a means to further a fraudulent scheme.

Defining the Crimes of Mail/Wire Fraud

Mail fraud (18 U.S.C. section 1341) and wire fraud (18 U.S.C. section 1343) are both federal crimes. Each is a lengthy and complex statute, but can be basically boiled down into three elements. To be convicted of mail fraud, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt:

  1. A scheme existed for the purposes of committing fraud;
  1. You knowingly and willfully participated in the scheme; and
  1. You used a public or private mail service or interstate or foreign wire communication to further the scheme.1

 

Though these elements seem simple enough, there are some terms that require further clarification.

Defining “Fraud”

Under this statute, fraud is defined as:

“Misrepresentation or concealment of a material fact or matter or the scheme to obtain money or property by means of false or fraudulent pretenses involving a false statement, assertion, half-truth or knowing concealment concerning a material fact or matter.”

Put more simply, fraud is essentially the knowing or reckless misrepresentation of a material fact for the purpose of depriving someone of a valuable thing. This means that you knew that what you represented to the other person was not true, or that you represented to the other person something as true that you knew was potentially false or fraudulent.

The misrepresentation must concern a material fact, which means the fact must be something important that the victim would consider in making his or her decision. It also must be something that would fool a person of “ordinary prudence”. This means that the misrepresentation cannot be something so outrageous that the average careful person would not believe to be true.

“Use of the Mail”

Under 18 U.S.C. section 1343, use of the mail has been defined as any of the following:

  • Placing materials in a post office, mailbox, or other receptacle with intent that the materials are delivered by either the U.S. Postal Service or a private interstate mail carrier to someone else;
  • Receiving anything that has been delivered to you by the U.S. Postal Service or a private mail carrier; or
  • Causing something to be delivered by mail, such as asking someone else to put the materials into a mailbox on your behalf.

 

“Use of Wire Communication”

Under this statute, “wire communication” means transmitting, receiving, or causing something to be transmitted or received through radio signal, television signal, an interstate telephone or electronic communication in furtherance of the scheme.2 This can include text or instant messaging, cellular calls, or Internet-based communications of any kind.

“Intent to Defraud”

A mail or wire fraud conviction requires that you specifically intended to deceive or defraud someone else. This means the prosecution must show that you knew about the fraud scheme, and that you had the specific goal of committing fraud when you placed the materials in the mail, or transmitted them through electronic communications.

Related Crimes

punishment - federal mail or wire fraud conviction
If you are convicted of federal mail fraud or wire fraud, you face up to 20 years in state prison.

Because the act of mail or wire fraud is usually connected with other types of fraud, it is generally charged in conjunction with many other types of fraud crimes. Some of these might include:

  • Senior/Elder fraud (fraud that targets the elderly).

 

However, because mail and wire fraud are federal crimes, you could be subject to trials in both federal and state courts, depending on your case.

Penalties for Mail/Wire Fraud

If you are convicted of mail or wire fraud, you face a sentence of 20 years in federal prison, a fine of up to $250,000 ($500,000 for organizations), or both prison and fine. However, if the fraud targeted any benefit related to a presidentially declared disaster or emergency, or if it affects a financial institution, you face a sentence of up to 30 years in federal prison and a fine of up to $1,000,000.

Defenses to Mail/Wire Fraud Charges

If you have been charged with federal mail or wire fraud, a skilled federal criminal defense attorney can raise several defenses on your behalf. These may include:

  • Lack of Knowledge – In order for you top be convicted, prosecution must prove that you knew of the fraudulent scheme. In many cases, people are charged with mail or wire fraud because they are unwitting accomplices to a fraud being perpetrated by their superiors at work, who ask them to place materials in support of the fraud in the mail, or to send out fraudulent email messages. If you did not know that you were participating in the scheme, you should not be convicted of mail or wire fraud.
  • Lack of Intent – The prosecution must also prove that you intended to commit fraud. For example, if you reasonably believed the material facts or matters specified through your communication to be true, but were unable to meet these terms due to extenuating factors that occurred after the fact, you should not be convicted of fraud. However, you could face civil consequences if the alleged victim suffered any loss, regardless of your intent.
  • Insufficient Evidence ­­– If there are any inconsistencies or weaknesses in the evidence presented by the prosecution, your attorney may be able to use this in your favor. For example, let’s say you are being federally charged with wire fraud because a scheme was allegedly traced back to your email address. However, records show that the email address was not active for a significant period prior to the alleged incident. Your attorney may argue that someone could have hacked your email address while it was inactive and that the evidence does not show beyond a reasonable doubt that you are guilty of this crime. In this scenario, you should not be convicted of wire fraud.

 

Frequently Asked Questions on 18 USC 1341 & 1343

  1. If the other person suffers no actual loss, can I still be charged with mail fraud?

Yes. Under 18 U.S.C. 1341 and 1343, mail or wire fraud does not require that the alleged victim of the fraud actually suffer a loss. The crime is complete the moment the materials related to the scheme are dropped in the mail or transmitted by electronic communication, regardless of whether the fraud is ultimately successful.

  1. Can I be charged with mail fraud if I used the mail only after the alleged victim of fraud has already provided me with money?

Yes, provided the materials you sent continued to support the scheme. This was the case in United States v. Price, where the court ruled that although the defendant had received the money from his fraudulent scheme prior to using the mail, the letters he sent were in support of the fraud because they were designed to “lull his customers into inaction and to postpone detection of his scheme.”3 Thus, if you allegedly commit a fraud and receive money from an alleged victim, and then subsequently send letters in an effort to convince the alleged victim of the legitimacy of the scheme so that they do not call authorities to investigate, your letters would be in furtherance of the alleged fraud, and you would then be subject to mail fraud charges.

  1. Can I be charged with mail or wire fraud if my messages were delivered to a person I did not intend to send them to?

Yes. In fact, you do not have to have a specific person in mind when you send out the materials in support of the fraud. Mail and wire fraud laws only require an intent to defraud “someone,” which can be either a specific person who you intended to receive the messages, or anyone who may have inadvertently seen the messages.

Contact Wallin & Klarich If You Have Been Charged with Mail Fraud

partners 2015 - federal mail or wire fraud
The attorneys at Wallin & Klarich have been defending those charged with federal crimes for over 30 years.

If you or a loved one is facing mail fraud charges, it is critical that you speak to an experienced criminal defense attorney as soon as possible. At Wallin & Klarich, our attorneys have over 30 years of experience successfully those charged with federal crimes. We can help you, too. We are committed to providing you with the personal attention you deserve, and to helping you overcome this difficult situation.

With offices in Los Angeles, Sherman Oaks, Torrance, Tustin, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, West Covina and Victorville, there is a Wallin & Klarich attorney experienced in federal criminal defense near you, no matter where you work or live.

Call us today at (877) 4-NO-JAIL or (877) 466-5245 for a free phone consultation. We will be there when you call.


1. 18 U.S.C. § 1341.

2. 18 U.S.C. § 1343; see also United States v. Briscoe, 65 F.3d 576, 583 (7th Cir. 1995) (citing United States v. Ames Sintering Co., 927 F.2d 232, 234 (6th Cir. 1990) (per curiam)); United States v. Frey, 42 F.3d 795, 797 (3d Cir. 1994) (wire fraud is identical to mail fraud statute except that it speaks of communications transmitted by wire); see also, e.g., United States v. Profit, 49 F.3d 404, 406 n. 1 (8th Cir.) (the four essential elements of the crime of wire fraud are: (1) that the defendant voluntarily and intentionally devised or participated in a scheme to defraud another out of money; (2) that the defendant did so with the intent to defraud; (3) that it was reasonably foreseeable that interstate wire communications would be used; and (4) that interstate wire communications were in fact used) (citing Manual of Model Criminal Jury Instructions for the District Courts of the Eighth Circuit 6.18.1341 (West 1994)), cert. denied, 115 S.Ct. 2289 (1995)

3. United States v. Price, (9th Cir. 1980) 623 F.2d 587, 590 (overruled on other grounds by United States v. De Bright, (9th Cir. 1984) 730 F.2d 1255, 1259).

Was This Article Helpful? Please Share it.

Contact Us

Get Help Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, now is the time to contact us.
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Related Testimonials

    "

    I would like to sincerely thank you for helping me with obtaining my Certificate of Rehabilitation. I now realize the importance of obtaining a law firm that has years of experience in criminal law. The way the package was organized and presented to the presiding judge was very impressive to me. The person that tried … Continue reading “Certificate of Rehabilitation and Governor’s Pardon Testimonials”

    View All
    "

    My brother was convicted of second degree murder in Los Angeles County. He was sentenced to 16 years to life in state prison. I hired Stephen Klarich from the law firm of Wallin and Klarich to work on his appeal. Our family was very worried and fearful he would spend the rest of his life … Continue reading “PC 1237 | Appeals Testimonials”

    View All
    "

    ARSON: “My husband and I received a shock recently when our son was arrested for starting a fire at a state park. But our shock turned into horror when he was charged with felony arson. We immediately hired the Law Firm of Wallin & Klarich. After a review of the evidence, Wallin & Klarich had … Continue reading “Client Testimonials: Arson”

    View All
attorneys

Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, this is the time to contact us.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
awards
Get In Touch
Contact Info
wklaw
17592 Irvine Blvd. Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 730-5300
(877) 466-5245
Counties

Los Angeles County

Los Angeles | Long Beach | Glendale | Santa Clarita | Lancaster | Palmdale | Pomona | Torrance | Pasadena | West Covina | Carson | Santa Monica | Whittier | Lakewood | Redondo Beach | Arcadia | Diamond Bar | Glendora | Cerritos | La Mirada | Rancho Palos Verdes | Culver City | Manhattan Beach | Claremont | Beverly Hills | San Dimas | Walnut | Calabasas | Hermosa Beach | El Segundo | Palos Verdes Estates | Malibu

Orange County

Santa Ana | Anaheim | Irvine | Huntington Beach | Garden Grove | Orange | Fullerton | Costa Mesa | Mission Viejo | Westminster | Newport Beach | Buena Park | Lake Forest | Tustin | Yorba Linda | San Clemente | Laguna Niguel | La Habra | Fountain Valley | Anaheim Hills | Placentia | Rancho Santa Margarita | Aliso Viejo | Cypress | Brea | Stanton | San Juan Capistrano | Dana Point | Laguna Hills | North Tustin | Seal Beach | Ladera Ranch | Laguna Beach | Laguna Woods | La Palma | Coto de Caza | Los Alamitos | Rossmoor | Midway City | Las Flores | Villa Park

Riverside County

Riverside | Moreno Valley | Corona | Temecula | Murrieta | Jurupa Valley | Indio | Hemet | Menifee | Perris | Eastvale | Cathedral City | Palm Desert | Lake Elsinore | Palm Springs | La Quinta | Coachella | San Jacinto | Beaumont | Wildomar | Banning | Norco | Desert Hot Springs | Blythe | Rancho Mirage | Canyon Lake | Calimesa | Indian Wells

San Bernardino County

San Bernardino | Fontana | Rancho Cucamonga | Ontario | Victorville | Rialto | Hesperia | Chino | Chino Hills | Upland | Apple Valley | Redlands | Highland | Colton | Yucaipa | Montclair | Adelanto | Twentynine Palms | Loma Linda | Barstow | Yucca Valley | Grand Terrace | Big Bear Lake | Needles

San Diego

San Diego | Oceanside | Escondido | Carlsbad | Vista | San Marcos | Encinitas | Solana Beach | El Cajon | Santee | Poway | La Mesa | Del Mar

Ventura

Oxnard | Thousand Oaks | Simi Valley | Ventura | Camarillo | Moorpark | Santa Paula | Port Hueneme | Fillmore | Ojai

Copyright © 2018 Wallin & Klarich - All rights reserved
California Criminal Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor should it be considered the formation of a lawyer or attorney-client relationship. Any case results presented on the site are based upon the facts of a particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. The contents of this website may contain legal advertising. If you would like to find out more information about your particular legal matter, contact our office for a free telephonic consultation. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California.
X