35+ Years Criminal Defense Experience in California


Child Annoyance Prosecution California Penal Code 647.6 PC

If you have been charged with child annoyance or molesting of a child in California, it is important to understand what this crime entails. Our attorneys at Wallin & Klarich want to share with you what the prosecution needs to prove in order to convict you of this offense.

Child Annoyance or molesting of a child – CA PC 647.6

Under California Penal Code section 647.6 it is illegal to annoy or molest any minor under the age of 18 while motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in the minor. In order to convict you of this offense, the prosecution must prove the following:

Our attorney at Wallin & Klarich explain what the prosecution needs to prove in order to find you guilty of child annoyance or molest in California.
You do not have to face the prosecutor alone. Let us show you how we protect our own. 

1. You engaged in conduct directed at a minor AND

2. A normal person, without hesitation, would have been disturbed, irritated, offended, or injured by your conduct AND

3. Your conduct was motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in the minor AND

4. The minor was under the age of 18 years at the time of the conduct


If it is alleged that you committed the offense by entering an inhabited area without consent, the prosecution must also prove:

  1. You entered an inhabited dwelling house, building or trailer coach without consent AND
  2. After entering the house, building or trailer you engaged in conduct directed at a minor


Conduct directed at a minor

The prosecution must prove that you engaged in some sort of conduct directed at minor (child under 18 years of age). The conduct itself does not actually have to be sexual in nature, meaning that you don’t need to touch the minor or expose yourself in order to satisfy this element. Rather, any conduct will suffice so long as it is directed at a minor. However, a recent decision handed down by the California Court of Appeals held that this conduct does not need to be directed at any one child in particular. It is enough that your conduct be directed at a group of children without singling out one specific minor.

Disturbed, irritated, offended, or injured

“Annoy” and “molest” are synonymous and generally refer to conduct designed to disturb, irritate, offend, injure or tend to injure another person. Annoy means to disturb or irritate, especially by continued or repeated acts. Molest means to interfere with or meddle with so as to injure or disturb another.

In order to be convicted of this offense your conduct must have disturbed, irritated, offended, or injured a “normal person.” This is an objective standard, meaning that your conduct does not actually have to offend or irritate the victim so long as a reasonable person in his or her position would have been offended or irritated by your actions. You also do not need to touch the victim in order to face criminal liability for this offense. For example: You can “annoy” a minor by taking his or her picture in a public place in an offensive or irritating manner.

Unnatural or abnormal sexual interest

You conduct must have been motivated by an unnatural or abnormal sexual interest in the minor victim. This is a difficult element to prove because absent a confession, the prosecution will have to rely on circumstantial evidence in order to reveal the motive behind your actions. Evidence showing that you were sexually aroused or gratified by your conduct directed at the minor will likely satisfy this requirement.

Victim was under 18 years of age

The prosecution must also prove that the victim was a minor (under the age of 18) at the time you committed the offense. Under the law, a person becomes one year older as soon as the first minute of his or her birthday has begun.

Entering a dwelling, building, trailer coach without consent

If it is alleged that you entered a structure without consent during the commission of the crime, the prosecution must also prove that your conduct occurred after you entered an inhabited dwelling, building or trailer coach without consent. A dwelling, building, or trailer coach is inhabited if someone lives there and is either present or has left with the intent to return. This also includes any structure that is attached and functionally connected to building, such as an office or garage. Consent to enter the structure is only valid if it is given freely and voluntarily.

Contact an attorney at Wallin & Klarich if you have been charged with annoying or molesting a child

If you or someone you know has been charged with annoying or molesting a child in California, you need to contact an experienced criminal defense attorney who is dedicated to giving you the best representation possible. With offices in Orange County, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Bernardino, Riverside, Ventura, Victorville and West Covina, Wallin & Klarich has successfully represented clients facing annoying or molesting a child charges for over 30 years. Drawing from our extensive experience, our talented defense lawyers will thoroughly review your case and develop an effective defense strategy to help win your case.

Call Wallin & Klarich today at (877) 466-5245  fill out our confidential form. We will be there when you call.

Was This Article Helpful? Please Share it.


Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, now is the time to contact us.

Related Testimonials


    I would like to sincerely thank you for helping me with obtaining my Certificate of Rehabilitation. I now realize the importance of obtaining a law firm that has years of experience in criminal law. The way the package was organized and presented to the presiding judge was very impressive to me. The person that tried … Continue reading “Certificate of Rehabilitation and Governor’s Pardon Testimonials”

    View All

    My brother was convicted of second degree murder in Los Angeles County. He was sentenced to 16 years to life in state prison. I hired Stephen Klarich from the law firm of Wallin and Klarich to work on his appeal. Our family was very worried and fearful he would spend the rest of his life … Continue reading “PC 1237 | Appeals Testimonials”

    View All

    ARSON: “My husband and I received a shock recently when our son was arrested for starting a fire at a state park. But our shock turned into horror when he was charged with felony arson. We immediately hired the Law Firm of Wallin & Klarich. After a review of the evidence, Wallin & Klarich had … Continue reading “Client Testimonials: Arson”

    View All

Contact Us Now

If you or a loved one have been accused of a crime, this is the time to contact us.


Get In Touch

Contact Info

17592 Irvine Blvd. Tustin, CA 92780 (714) 730-5300
(877) 466-5245


Los Angeles County

Los Angeles | Long Beach | Glendale | Santa Clarita | Lancaster | Palmdale | Pomona | Torrance | Pasadena | West Covina | Carson | Santa Monica | Whittier | Lakewood | Redondo Beach | Arcadia | Diamond Bar | Glendora | Cerritos | La Mirada | Rancho Palos Verdes | Culver City | Manhattan Beach | Claremont | Beverly Hills | San Dimas | Walnut | Calabasas | Hermosa Beach | El Segundo | Palos Verdes Estates | Malibu

Orange County

Santa Ana | Anaheim | Irvine | Huntington Beach | Garden Grove | Orange | Fullerton | Costa Mesa | Mission Viejo | Westminster | Newport Beach | Buena Park | Lake Forest | Tustin | Yorba Linda | San Clemente | Laguna Niguel | La Habra | Fountain Valley | Anaheim Hills | Placentia | Rancho Santa Margarita | Aliso Viejo | Cypress | Brea | Stanton | San Juan Capistrano | Dana Point | Laguna Hills | North Tustin | Seal Beach | Ladera Ranch | Laguna Beach | Laguna Woods | La Palma | Coto de Caza | Los Alamitos | Rossmoor | Midway City | Las Flores | Villa Park

Riverside County

Riverside | Moreno Valley | Corona | Temecula | Murrieta | Jurupa Valley | Indio | Hemet | Menifee | Perris | Eastvale | Cathedral City | Palm Desert | Lake Elsinore | Palm Springs | La Quinta | Coachella | San Jacinto | Beaumont | Wildomar | Banning | Norco | Desert Hot Springs | Blythe | Rancho Mirage | Canyon Lake | Calimesa | Indian Wells

San Bernardino County

San Bernardino | Fontana | Rancho Cucamonga | Ontario | Victorville | Rialto | Hesperia | Chino | Chino Hills | Upland | Apple Valley | Redlands | Highland | Colton | Yucaipa | Montclair | Adelanto | Twentynine Palms | Loma Linda | Barstow | Yucca Valley | Grand Terrace | Big Bear Lake | Needles

San Diego

San Diego | Oceanside | Escondido | Carlsbad | Vista | San Marcos | Encinitas | Solana Beach | El Cajon | Santee | Poway | La Mesa | Del Mar


Oxnard | Thousand Oaks | Simi Valley | Ventura | Camarillo | Moorpark | Santa Paula | Port Hueneme | Fillmore | Ojai

Copyright © 2016 Wallin & Klarich - All rights reserved
California DUI Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. Please contact a criminal attorney for a consultation on your particular legal matter. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California. * Wallin & Klarich Attorney Joshua Visco