• Home
  • Practice Areas
  • Attorneys
  • Videos
  • Offices
  • Testimonials
  • Process
  • About
  • Resource Center
    • California Inmate Location
    • California Criminal Case Search
    • California Laws, Codes & Statutes
    • California Rehabilitation, Treatment and Counseling Centers
    • Los Angeles
    • Orange County
    • Riverside County
    • San Bernardino
    • San Diego
    • Ventura

OR


Payment Plans Available in Some Cases*

Home » Practice Areas » Manslaughter – Overview » Voluntary Manslaughter – Overview » Voluntary Manslaughter FAQs

More California Voluntary Manslaughter – Overview information

  • Voluntary Manslaughter – Overview
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Prosecution
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Defenses
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Sentencing and Penalties
    • Voluntary Manslaughter FAQs

Voluntary Manslaughter FAQs – California Penal Code Section 192(a)

 

  1. Can I be charged with voluntary manslaughter for the death of a fetus?
  2. No. Manslaughter does not apply to the death of a fetus. Although the definition of murder in California Penal Code Section 187 includes the killing of a fetus, manslaughter only applies to the “unlawful killing of a human being.”

  3. If a murder charge can be reduced to voluntary manslaughter, what can voluntary manslaughter be reduced to?
  4. Voluntary manslaughter can be reduced to attempted voluntary manslaughter, which basically requires proving the same elements – but it also requires showing that the defendant intended to kill the person and took at least one direct but ineffective step toward that intent.

    Involuntary manslaughter, however, is not a lesser offense; it is a related offense. Therefore, voluntary manslaughter cannot be reduced to involuntary manslaughter.

  5. How is voluntary manslaughter different from murder?
  6. Murder is defined as the unlawful killing of a human being, or fetus, with malice aforethought. Voluntary manslaughter, on the other hand, does not require malice aforethought, but is defined as a killing of a human being that is provoked in the heat of passion or by a sudden quarrel. Murder is considered a capital offense that can result in either the death penalty or a lifetime prison sentence. Voluntary manslaughter, by contrast, does not rise to the level of murder and incurs a maximum penalty of 11 years in state prison.

  7. What qualifies as sufficient provocation that can cause a reasonable person to act in the heat of passion?
  8. While there is no concrete definition of what qualifies as provocation, courts have recognized that the sight of a spouse being unfaithful, the murder of a family member, or unprovoked physical attacks were enough of a provocation to characterize the defendant’s killing as voluntary manslaughter. On the other hand, name-calling, simple trespass, or the belief that a family member has been abused, were held not qualify as sufficient provocation.

  9. Are there other ways for me to be charged with voluntary manslaughter?

Yes. You may also be charged with voluntary manslaughter if you killed a human being while acting in self-defense (or in the defense of others) that is not entirely justified. If you killed a person believing that you were in immediate danger of being killed or severely injured, you will be charged with voluntary manslaughter if that belief was unreasonable. This form of voluntary manslaughter is referred to as an “imperfect self-defense.”

More California Voluntary Manslaughter – Overview information

  • Voluntary Manslaughter – Overview
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Prosecution
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Defenses
    • Voluntary Manslaughter - Sentencing and Penalties
    • Voluntary Manslaughter FAQs

Related Articles

    • HOW CAN WE HELP YOU

      Please fill out the following form and
      we will contact you as soon as possible

      1. Captcha
       

      cforms contact form by delicious:days

    • What Our Clients Say

      More Testimonials

    • Videos

      TV & RADIO APPEARANCES

      More Videos
    • Latest Firm News

      BLOG POST

      May 25,2012,Criminal Defense Attorney

      Wallin & Klarich Attorney David E. Wohl Discusses with Megyn Kelly Sharon Stone's Harassment Accusations

      Sharon Stone could soon have major legal woes. Erlinda Elemen, her children’s former nanny, claims in a lawsuit she just filed that Stone repeatedly subjected her to painful “slurs” related to her Filipino ethnicity and heritage during her five years as a live-in housekeeper and nanny. Elemen claims Stone made derogatory comments about her Filipino accent and food and told her not to.....

      Visit Our Blog
    • Wallin & Klarich

      Social Links

      • Digg
      • Facebook
      • Delicious
      • Stumble
      • Twitter
      • LinkedIn
      • Technorati favorites
      • Reddit
      • Mixx
      • Newsvine

    Free Legal Consultation!

    1. Captcha
     

    cforms contact form by delicious:days

      • Home
      • Practice Areas
      • Attorneys
      • Locations
      • Criminal Process
      • Videos
      • About Us
      • Español

    California Criminal Defense Lawyer Disclaimer: The legal information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice, nor the formation of a lawyer or attorney client relationship. Any results set forth herein are based upon the facts of that particular case and do not represent a promise or guarantee. Please contact a criminal attorney for a consultation on your particular legal matter. This web site is not intended to solicit clients for matters outside of the state of California. © 2010 Wallin & Klarich - All rights reserved. California Criminal Defense Lawyers and DUI Defense Attorneys serving all areas of Southern California.

    Attorney Referral Link | Sitemap | Design by BPIZZY