Motion for a new trial California Grounds for a New Trial

Under CA PC 1181, the California Legislature has listed several circumstances that unfairly prejudice your right to a fair and impartial trial and can act as grounds for requesting an entirely new court proceeding in a motion for a new trial California. Our attorneys at Wallin & Klarich explain how each of these grounds can be raised depending on the facts of your individual case.

Motions for a New Trial California Jury misconduct

All jury members are instructed by the court to follow procedural formalities and to abide by a certain code of conduct to insure that you are afforded a fair trial. A violation of these court mandated orders can serve as grounds for your motion for a new trial and a dismissal of your current criminal case.

 

Outside evidence:

One form of jury misconduct occurs when one or more members of the jury receive any evidence outside of court other than that resulting from a view of the crime scene or personal property. For example if any juror receives outside information that has not been submitted into evidence or noted in the record, this can serve as grounds for granting a new trial.

 

Improper deliberations as grounds to motion for a new trial California:

If the jury has separated without leave of the court during the time in which they are given to deliberate upon their verdict or have engaged in any misconduct which prevents a fair and due consideration of the case, this can serve as a grounds for granting a new trial. All members of the jury are required to discuss the case and come to a verdict as a cohesive group. Any deviation from the group centered deliberation process is improper and will unfairly prejudice your right to fair trial. In addition, the jury can only discuss evidence that has been admitted during the court proceedings and cannot comment on your failure to testify if you choose not to do so.

Improper verdict:

If you think you have received an improper verdict call us now for a free phone consultation.

The jury must consider the evidence: they are not allowed to toss a coin to determine guilt.

The jury is forbidden from reaching a verdict by any means other than a fair expression of opinion on part of ALL of the jurors. If the jury has come to a verdict without careful consideration of the evidence or input from all jurors who wish to speak on the matter, this can act as grounds for granting a new trial. Methods for determining your guilt without consideration of the evidence such as (flipping a coin) are expressly forbidden and unanimous consent from all members of the jury is required.

 

Other grounds to Motion for a new trial California Penal Code 1181:

Jury misconduct can encompass a wide range of improper activity and can constitute grounds for granting a new trial if it has adversely affected your right to a fair and impartial court proceeding. Some other examples of misconduct include:

  • Intentionally misleading the attorneys or judge during jury selection
  • Juror intoxication during trial court proceedings or deliberations that renders him or her unfit or incompetent to serve
  • Sleeping or not paying attention to the evidence presented during trial

 

Error of law by the court

If the court has committed a legal error that substantially impairs your right to a fair and impartial trial, your attorney can make a motion for a new trial.

Proceeding without the defendant’s presence:

Call us now for a free phone consultation.

If the court proceeds in your absence you may be eligible to motion for a new trial.

 

As a defendant in a criminal matter, you have a constitutional and statutory right to be present during all stages of trial. If the court proceeds with the trial in your absence, this can constitute gross legal error and serves as grounds for granting a motion for a new trial California PC 1181. However, there are some circumstances where the trial court can proceed without your physical presence. If you have legally waived your presence or the court has removed you from the courtroom for misconduct, the judge can legally proceed without you and such action will not constitute grounds for granting a new trial.

Misdirecting the jury in a matter of law:

Grounds for granting a new trial can arise if the court has misdirected the jury in a matter of law or has erred in the decision of any question of law during the course of the trial. The court misdirects the jury in a matter of law if it incorrectly instructs the jury on the elements of the offense, the applicable law, or standards of conduct governing the jurors behavior. The court can also err in the decision of any question of law if it relies on outdated legal principles or cases that have been overturned by a higher court.

 

Insufficient evidence:

When the verdict or finding is contrary to the law or evidence, the judge has broad discretion in granting a new trial, or by modifying the verdict to a lesser offense or imposing a lesser punishment accordingly. If the trial judge finds that the jury verdict is not supported by the evidence, he or she can grant your motion for a new trial even if you have been found guilty of the alleged offense. The judge also has discretion in modifying your sentence or reducing the charge to a lesser offense if the evidence supports that finding.

 

Newly discovered evidence

If new evidence is discovered that is material to your case, and you could not, with reasonable diligence, have discovered and produced it at trial, you may have grounds to bring a motion for a new trial with the court. When the motion for a new trial is made, you are required to produce affidavits of the witnesses by whom such evidence is expected to be given and the court can postpone the hearing for a reasonable length of time to allow you to procure such evidence. The court will consider several factors in determining whether or not to grant your motion for a new trial:

  • Whether the evidence is cumulative
  • Whether you could have reasonably discovered and produced the evidence at trial
  • Whether presentation of the new evidence would result in a different result upon retrial

 

No record of the trial transcript

When the right to a phonographic report has not been waived and it is not possible to produce a record of the trial transcript due to the loss or destruction of the notes of the court reporter, the judge has the power to set aside and vacate the judgment and to order a new trial of the proceeding.

 

Contact an attorney at Wallin & Klarich to learn more about motions for a new trial

Call the Wallin & Klarich Southern California Defense Attorneys

Call the Wallin & Klarich Southern California Defense Attorneys

With offices in Orange County, Los Angeles, San Diego, Riverside, San Bernardino, Ventura, Victorville and West Covina, Wallin & Klarich has successfully represented clients facing criminal charges in California for over 30 years. Drawing from extensive experience, our talented California extradition attorneys will thoroughly review the facts and develop an effective defense strategy specifically tailored to your case. Our goal is to provide you with the best legal representation possible and help you win your case.

Call us for a free phone consultation at (877) 466-5245. We will be there when you call.

Was This Article Helpful? Please Share it.

Contact Us

  1. (required)
  2. (valid email required)
  3. Captcha
 

cforms contact form by delicious:days

,

Case Results