3/19/12 – Wallin and Klarich Obtains Dismissal of Serious Child Molestation Charges in L.A. County

2/1/2012 – Wallin and Klarich Wins Third Straight Not Guilty Verdict in Child Molestation Case

 

Wallin & Klarich Criminal Defense Attorneys

Over 30 Years Experience in Southern California

Wallin & Klarich is a team of highly skilled Southern California criminal defense attorneys. We have more than 30 years of experience defending clients who are facing criminal charges including misdemeanors, felonies, DUI/DWI and DMV hearings. We have years of experience handling cases in courts throughout Southern California, including Orange, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and Ventura Counties. We have the most prestigious rating a law firm can achieve, an AV Rating from Martindale-Hubbell. We have over thirty local offices to meet with you and discuss your case. We are one of the few law firms in Southern California that has such geographical diversity. This allows Wallin & Klarich to offer you the services of a highly qualified criminal defense firm with a deep knowledge of the judges, prosecutors and procedures in the exact court where your case is pending.


VIDEOS

Areas We Practice

Visit Our Blog

BLOG POST

  • May 22,2012,Criminal Defense Attorney

    Interstate Rendition

    You travel out of state for a much-needed vacation. At last you have managed to get away, see some interesting sites, perhaps meet some people. But then it all goes wrong. You get into a fight at a bar, or cause an accident. The vacation is ruined, and all you want to do is return home, leave the problems behind.   Unfortunately, this scenario is played out all too often among travelers.....

  • May 22,2012,Criminal Defense Attorney

    Police Can't Search Any of Your Genitals without a Search Warrant

    In a decision reached on May 18, 2012 a California Court of Appeals held that the trial judge was incorrect when it denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (PC 1538.5 for illegal search and seizure) that was seized from his penis subsequent to his arrest for rape. The District Attorney argued that the examination and “search” of the accused’s penis was justified “subsequent.....