3/19/12 – Wallin and Klarich Obtains Dismissal of Serious Child Molestation Charges in L.A. County
2/1/2012 – Wallin and Klarich Wins Third Straight Not Guilty Verdict in Child Molestation Case
Wallin & Klarich Criminal Defense Attorneys
Over 30 Years Experience in Southern California
Wallin & Klarich is a team of highly skilled Southern California criminal defense attorneys. We have more than 30 years of experience defending clients who are facing criminal charges including misdemeanors, felonies, DUI/DWI and DMV hearings. We have years of experience handling cases in courts throughout Southern California, including Orange, San Diego, Los Angeles, San Bernardino, Riverside and Ventura Counties. We have the most prestigious rating a law firm can achieve, an AV Rating from Martindale-Hubbell. We have over thirty local offices to meet with you and discuss your case. We are one of the few law firms in Southern California that has such geographical diversity. This allows Wallin & Klarich to offer you the services of a highly qualified criminal defense firm with a deep knowledge of the judges, prosecutors and procedures in the exact court where your case is pending.
VIDEOS
Areas We Practice
- Appropriation of Lost Property – Overview
- Bad Check Law – CPC 476a
- Check Fraud – Overview
- Child Pornography – CPC 311
- Indecent Exposure Overview
- Lewd or Lascivious Act with a Child – Penal Code 288
- Manslaughter – Overview
- Minor In Possession Overview
- Motion for New Trial – Introduction
- Oral copulation – Penal Code 288a
- Prostitution Overview
- Rape – Penal Code 261
- Resisting Arrest
- Watson Murder Overview
- Appeals
- Arson – CPC 451
- Assault – CPC 240
- Assault With a Deadly Weapon Overview – California Penal Code 245
- Bail
- Battery On Spouse – CPC 243
- Battery Overview – CPC 242
- Burglary Cases – CPC 459
- Car Jacking Overview – CPC 215
- Child Abuse Central Index Laws (CACI)
- Child Endangerment – CPC 273a
- Cleaning Up Your Criminal Record
- Competency to Stand Trial
- Concealed Weapons – Possession of Firearms
- Corporal Injury On A Child – CPC 273d
- Corporal Injury On A Spouse or Domestic Partner – CPC 273.5
- Criminal Process
- Criminal Threats – CPC 422
- DMV Hearing
- Domestic Violence
- Driving on Suspended License
- Drug Cases
- Drug Diversion Programs
- Drunk Driving Offenses
- Drunk in Public
- Elder Abuse
- Embezzlement
- Extradition
- Federal Crimes
- Felony Sentencing
- Fraud and Forgery Cases
- Gross Vehicular Manslaughter While Intoxicated
- Hit and Run Cases
- Internet Crimes
- Juvenile Law
- Military Crimes
- Murder – Penal Code 187
- Petty Theft
- Possession for Sale of Marijuana
- Possession of a Controlled Substance
- Possession of a Dirk or Dagger
- Possession of Drug Paraphernalia
- Possession of Marijuana
- Possession of Methamphetamines
- Probation Violation
- Public Intoxication
- Receiving Stolen Property
- Reckless Driving Cases
- Robbery Cases
- Sale of Marijuana
- School Expulsions
- Sentence Modification
- Sex Crimes
- Sex Offender Registration – PC 290
- Sex Registration / PC 290 / Megan’s Law
- SPEED CONTEST / SPEED RACING – Overview
- Stalking – CPC Section 646.9
- Strike Cases
- Theft Crimes
- Transportation & Sale of a Controlled Substance
- Vandalism Charges
- Violation of Restraining Order
- Violent Crimes
- Warrants
- Withdrawal Of Plea
- Writing a False Prescription
- Possession of Drugs For Sale
BLOG POST
-
May 22,2012,Criminal Defense Attorney
Interstate Rendition
You travel out of state for a much-needed vacation. At last you have managed to get away, see some interesting sites, perhaps meet some people. But then it all goes wrong. You get into a fight at a bar, or cause an accident. The vacation is ruined, and all you want to do is return home, leave the problems behind. Unfortunately, this scenario is played out all too often among travelers.....
-
May 22,2012,Criminal Defense Attorney
Police Can't Search Any of Your Genitals without a Search Warrant
In a decision reached on May 18, 2012 a California Court of Appeals held that the trial judge was incorrect when it denied the defendant’s motion to suppress evidence (PC 1538.5 for illegal search and seizure) that was seized from his penis subsequent to his arrest for rape. The District Attorney argued that the examination and “search” of the accused’s penis was justified “subsequent.....
Download
